January 4, 1978–February 28, 1988
Pawtucket, Rhode Island
Christine Cole had turned 10 two days before she left her Pawtucket home to run an ordinary neighborhood errand. She was a daughter, sister, classmate and friend and her life deserves to be remembered as more than the mystery of what happened next.
On January 4, 1988, Christine Cole turned ten years old. Her birthday fell on a Monday, it was a snow day and there was no school.
Christine lived at 67 West Avenue in Pawtucket’s Woodlawn neighborhood with her mother, Margaret; Margaret’s longtime partner, Oscar Waldron; and her little brothers, Clint, Shane and Oscar. Her life was rooted in the familiar streets, schools, stores and relationships surrounding her home.
These details are modest but, they matter. Before Christine’s name appeared in missing child notices, police reports and newspaper coverage, she was a daughter, a sister, a third grade student and a friend. She had only just turned 10 and two days later she disappeared.
Her life was larger than the unresolved homicide record that followed.

On Wednesday, January 6, 1988, Christine returned home from school at approximately 3:15 p.m. Later that afternoon, she left 67 West Avenue on a errand. The reported time Christine left home shifted from approximately 4:00 p.m. to as late as 5:15 p.m.
The earliest police account described ten dollars in food stamps and a trip to buy milk. Later reports added clams, potato chips, gum or gumballs along with changing descriptions of cash, food stamps and change.
Over the next several hours witnesses placed Christine at Red’s Seafood, Wilmarth Court and Saint’s Market. Those accounts preserve parts of her movement through the neighborhood but, they do not form one settled route. The record establishes that Christine left home on an ordinary errand. It does not establish precisely when she left, everything she intended to purchase or the exact order of the places she visited.
Christine’s story has often been retold as though her movements on January 6 were settled. The surviving record shows otherwise. Accounts changed while the search was still underway and later retellings often selected one version without acknowledging the others.
Published accounts placed Christine’s departure at approximately 4:00, 4:15, 5:00 or 5:15 p.m. These times cannot all describe the same departure, and the difference changes how every later sighting fits into the evening.
Witnesses placed Christine at Red’s, Wilmarth Court and Saint’s Market. The reported times, purpose and order of those stops shifted across accounts. Together the sightings establish parts of her movement through the neighborhood but, not one complete route.
Descriptions of Christine’s appearance changed during the search. Her dark-blonde hair was reported as long, short and cut in a pageboy style with bangs, while accounts of her clothing also varied. The surviving record does not conclusively establish one consistent description of how Christine looked when she left home or that every item recovered with her was the same clothing she wore that afternoon.
The first account described Christine leaving with ten dollars to buy milk. Later versions added other purchases and changed the descriptions of cash, food stamps and change. Six dollars in food stamps were recovered from a pants pocket, but the record does not establish that they were the same food stamps Christine carried when she left home or when they entered that pocket.
A necklace associated with Christine appeared in witness accounts, family identification and the recovery record. But descriptions of the necklace, including a report that it had broken earlier that evening, create unresolved questions about its condition and continuity.
Christine was reported at Saint’s Market at approximately 7:00 to 7:10 p.m. Later sightings were investigated, revised or withdrawn. The surviving record does not establish her movements after she left the store.
These conflicts do not erase what is known.
They define the limits of it.
Christine disappeared during a period of dangerous winter cold. Police searched door to door through the Woodlawn neighborhood, while officers, volunteers and other agencies examined the places a ten-year-old child might have reached on foot.
The search expanded beyond the immediate neighborhood. The FBI assisted. A helicopter searched from above, and search dogs were brought in to follow possible routes. Contemporary reports identified two dogs, Justice and Lady, used at different points in the search, a distinction that later retellings sometimes lost.
As the days passed, the public explanations changed. Police initially considered whether Christine had wandered away or found shelter somewhere warm. Later statements raised the possibilities of exposure, abduction or death. These were developing investigative positions, not established conclusions.
Despite the scale of the search, no publicly documented account established where Christine went after Saint’s Market. The search widened. The central gap in her story remained.

On February 28, 1988, more than seven weeks after Christine disappeared, her body was recovered along the northern shoreline at Conimicut Point in Warwick.
Her mother, Margaret, and Oscar Waldron identified her through photographs.
Police initially stated that the tide had carried Christine to Conimicut Point and later described a possible twelve mile water route from the Seekonk River. That explanation entered the public story quickly but, the surviving record does not establish where or when Christine entered the water or the path she traveled before reaching the shoreline.
On March 1, police declared Christine’s death a homicide. The medical findings identified asphyxia with submersion and noted that subtle mechanical asphyxia could not be excluded. They did not establish the location of the fatal events or account for Christine’s movements after she was last reported at Saint’s Market.
Christine had been found. The central questions surrounding her death remained.

The surviving record establishes parts of Christine’s final documented afternoon and evening. It does not provide a complete sequence of what happened to her.
The unresolved questions include:
These are not gaps to be filled with assumption. They are the questions the record leaves behind—and the reason Christine’s story must remain open to careful examination.
Christine’s story is the first season of remember. dont forget. the documentary podcast from Return to the Record.
The season follows the surviving record as it unfolded: from Christine’s final documented afternoon through the search, her recovery and the questions that remain. It does not smooth conflicting accounts into one convenient version or claim to solve her homicide. It returns to the original reporting, preserves the contradictions and keeps Christine at the center of her own story.
Season One: Christine Cole is currently in production.
Audio excerpts and release information will be added here.
This page is drawn from the Christine Cole Combined Documentary Chronology, a source-controlled reconstruction of the surviving public record.
The chronology includes contemporaneous newspaper reporting, broadcast transcripts, public statements from law enforcement, medical findings, court records, later retrospective coverage and other available documentary material. Sources are placed in chronological order so that early reporting remains distinguishable from later interpretation.
Where accounts conflict, both versions are preserved. Where a detail cannot be traced to an original source, that limitation is identified. Evidence, inference and unresolved questions are kept separate.
This page will be updated as additional records become available or existing information is corrected. Substantive changes will be dated so the development of the record remains visible.
Last reviewed: September 20, 2026

Christine’s homicide remains unresolved. The passage of time has not made the contradictions in her record less important, nor has it diminished the life at the center of them.
Returning to Christine’s story means refusing to replace uncertainty with assumption. It means preserving what can still be documented, continuing to ask what the record does not explain and remembering Christine as more than the circumstances of her death.
Christine had just turned ten.
Her name is where this story begins.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.